Ask Saathi

HBITS rate chart: Systems Analyst · Junior

Every figure below is for this scenario all 30 vendors submit. Change any control and the cut-off moves.

What sets the cut-off: three numbers, and the greatest one applies (§1.4.3)Show
5th-lowest response
$39.02
Median + 5%
$45.54
Median + 1 standard deviationthe cut-off
$49.84
  • The greatest of the three applies — recomputed per task order over valid responses only, past the Mandatory Qualification and ≥60% of the Requested (§1.9.6).
  • They run over responses, not vendors 30 here: 30 vendors × 1 position × 1 candidate each.
  • Extra candidates move one number — each repeats that vendor’s own rate, so the median and σ stay put; only the 5th-lowest falls.

Every vendor, by what it bills the State

30 active vendors · 30 responses · 25 likely clear · Region 1
SubmitsVendorBillsVs cut-offRate schedule
×1Equiliem$58.03likely above1 Jul 2026
×1Experis$54.84likely above1 Jul 2024
×1Avenues$54.15likely above1 Jul 2026
×1TEKsystems$50.00likely above1 Jul 2019
×1OST$49.96likely above1 Jul 2026
×1Trigyn$49.09likely clears1 Jul 2024
×1Crossfire$46.68likely clears1 Jul 2026
×1Broad Crossing$45.04likely clears1 Jul 2026
×1Software People$45.02likely clears1 Jul 2024
×1Spruce$44.69likely clears1 Jul 2026
×1Tech Valley Talent$43.98likely clears1 Jul 2025
×1LanceSoft$43.79likely clears1 Jul 2023
×1S2Tech$43.72likely clears1 Jul 2026
×1CMA$43.56likely clears1 Jul 2025
×1Knowledge Builders$43.42likely clears1 Jul 2025
×1SVAM$43.32likely clears1 Jul 2019
×1Unique Comp$43.31likely clears1 Jul 2024
×1CTS$42.42likely clears1 Jul 2025
×1Sligo$42.27likely clears1 Jul 2026
×1I-Link$41.72likely clears1 Jul 2025
×1Greycell$41.52likely clears1 Jul 2026
×1System Edge$41.48likely clears1 Jul 2024
×1JSM$41.14likely clears1 Jul 2023
×1Genesys$40.68likely clears1 Jul 2026
×1Voyatek$40.39likely clears1 Jul 2026
×1MVP Consulting$39.02likely clears1 Jul 2026
×1Mindlance$37.37likely clears1 Jul 2026
×1Bits & Bytes$34.88likely clears1 Jul 2024
×1Panha$34.23likely clears1 Jul 2026
×1V Group$23.11likely clears1 Jul 2019

Submits — untick to take a vendor out; ×N is what it contributes if it does. Vendor — opens its OGS pricing schedule. Rate schedule — the effective date printed on it; vendors need not refile yearly, so an earlier date means those rates still stand. Tinted rows likely clear, and the rule above the first of them is where the cut-off falls. Likely — the cut-off moves with who submits, and §1.9.6’s technical bar is settled before rate is looked at.

Let only one vendor submit you — if two do, only the lowest bill rate counts, and a vendor needs your permission to put your name forward. The rule, and your lever in it →

Positions and candidates per position are both stated on the task order’s Form 1 (§1.2.1 and §1.2.2) — set them from it and the cut-off is computed for that order rather than a guess. They multiply: 1 × 1 = up to 1 response from each submitting vendor. Who actually submits is on no document anywhere.

Want to know when a Systems Analyst · Junior order is posted?

From 15 September we email you when a position we see posted on vendor sites matches this watch. Coverage is partial and every email says which vendors it covers.

Email me when one is posted

What we assume, stated plainly

  • PSI International and RMS Computer are excluded — contracts expired 30 June 2026, and an expired vendor cannot submit.
  • Valid responses only (§1.9.6) — the technical bar comes first; rate gates only what survives it.
  • “Lowest N” is a what-if — nothing says the cheapest vendors are likelier to submit. Leaving the dearest out lowers the cut-off, so it is the pessimistic end, not a forecast.
  • A band is indicative — the spread across two stated participation models, neither of which is real participation. A set you name is exact for that set, nothing more.
  • No per-vendor chance of clearing — on this data it moves by tens of points depending on which model you pick.

Sources — all public

Parsed 2026-09-02 · checked against OGS’s published averages

Published by Saathi Digital · rates as published in OGS award 23158 (Attachments 1, 4 and 7) · the cut-off and the band are our computation using OGS’s published method, not figures issued by OGS · information, not advice, and no prediction of any award · We are an independent publisher — not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of New York State, OGS or any State agency. Tell us and we will correct it.